Ontario Emergency Communications Network
Toronto EMCOMM Group
Ham Radio Disaster Services
Ham Radio....Getting the Message Through!
 Information: | Home | Antennas | Alternate Power Sources | Emergency Preparedness | Training | CANWARN | Agencies |
 Provinces Section:| AB | BC | MB | NB | NL | NT | NS | NU | ON | PE | QC | SK | YT |
 
Grounding is key to good reception

What's ground? If I connect the shield of my coax (which is grounded outside) to the antenna input of my R8, I hear lots of junk, indicating that there is an RF voltage difference between the coax shield and the R8 chassis. Last night this measured about S5.5, which is about -93 dBm (preamp off, 6KHz bandwidth). That's a lot of noise: it was 18 dB above my antenna's "noise floor", and 26 dB above the receiver's noise floor.

This sort of disagreement about ground potential is characteristic of electrically noisy environments. The receiver will, of course, respond to any voltage input that differs from its chassis ground. The antenna, on the other hand, is in a very different environment, and will have its own idea of what ground potential is. If you want to avoid noise pickup, you need to deliver a signal, referenced at the antenna to whatever its ground potential is, in such a way that when it arrives at the receiver, the reference potential is now the receiver's chassis potential. 

Coaxial cable represents one way to do this. Coax has two key properties: 

1. The voltage between the inner conductor and the shield depends only on the state of the electromagnetic field within the shield. 

2. The shield prevents the external electromagnetic field from influencing the internal electromagnetic field (but watch out at the ends of the cable!). 

So, it's easy, right? Run coax from the antenna to the receiver. Ground at the antenna end will be whatever the antenna thinks it is, while ground at the receiver end will be whatever the receiver thinks it is. The antenna will produce the appropriate voltage difference at the input side, and the receiver will see that voltage difference uncontaminated by external fields, according to the properties given above. 

Unfortunately, it doesn't quite work that way. It's all true as far as it goes, but it neglects the fact that the coax can also guide noise from your house to your antenna, where it can couple back into the cable and into your receiver. To see how this works, let me first describe how this noise gets around.

The noise I'm talking about here is more properly called "broadband electromagnetic interference" (EMI). It's made by computers, lamp dimmers, televisions, motors and other modern gadgets. I have all these things. In many cases, I can't get them turned off, because it would provoke intrafamilal rebellion. However, even when I turn them off, the noise in the house doesn't go down very much, because my neighbors all have them too. In any case, one of the worst offenders is my computer, which is such a handy radio companion I'm not about to turn it off.

Some of this noise is radiated, but the more troublesome component of this is conducted noise that follows utility wires. Any sort of cable supports a "common mode" of electromagnetic energy transport in which all of the conductors in the cable are at the some potential, but that potential differs from the potential of other nearby conductors ("ground"). The noise sources of concern generate common mode waves on power, telephone, and CATV cables which then distribute these waves around your neighborhood. They also generate "differential" mode waves, but simple filters can block these so they aren't normally a problem. 

So, let's say you have a longwire antenna attached to a coaxial cable through an MLB ("Magnetic Longwire Balun" [sic]). Suppose your next door neighbor turns on a dimmer switch. The resulting RF interference travels out his power lines, in through yours, through your receiver's power cord to its chassis, and out your coaxial cable to your MLB. Now on coax, a common mode wave is associated with a current on the shield only, while the mode we want the signal to be in, the "differential" mode, has equal but opposite currents flowing on shield and inner conductor. The MLB works by coupling energy from a current flowing between the antenna wire and the coax shield into into the differential mode. But wait a second: the current from the antenna flows on the coax shield just like the common mode current does.

Does this mean that the antenna mode is contaminated with the noise from your neighbor's dimmer?
The answer is a resounding, and unpleasant, yes! The way wire receiving antennas work is by first moving energy from free space into a common mode moving along the antenna wire, and then picking some of that off and coupling it into a mode on the feedline. In this case, the common mode current moving along the antenna wire flows into the common mode of the coax, and vice versa. The coax is not just feedline: it's an intimate part of the antenna! Furthermore, as we've seen, it's connected back through your electrical wiring to your neighbor's dimmer switch. You have a circuitous but electrically direct connection to this infernal noise source. No wonder it's such a nuisance! 

The solution is to somehow isolate the antenna from the common mode currents on the feedline. One common way to do this is with a balanced "dipole" antenna. Instead of connecting the feedline to the wire at the end, connect it to the middle. Now the antenna current can flow from one side of the antenna to the other, without having to involve the coax shield. Unfortunately, removing the necessity of having the coax be part of the antenna doesn't automatically isolate it: a coax-fed dipole is often only slightly quieter than an end-fed longwire. A "balun", a device which blocks common mode currents from the feedline, is often employed. This can improve the situation considerably. Note that this is not the same device as the miscalled "Magnetic Longwire Balun".
Another way is to ground the coaxial shield, "short circuiting" the common mode. Antenna currents flow into such a ground freely, in principle not interacting with noise currents. The best ground for such a purpose will be a earth ground near the antenna and far from utility lines.

Still another way is to block common mode waves by burying the cable. Soil is a very effective absorber of RF energy at close range. 

Unfortunately, none of these methods is generally adequate by itself in the toughest cases. Baluns are not perfectly effective at blocking common mode currents. Even the best balun can be partially defeated if there's any other unsymmetrical coupling between the antenna and feedline. Such coupling can occur if the feedline doesn't come away from the antenna at a right angle. Grounds are not perfect either. Cable burial generally lets some energy leak through. A combination of methods is usually required, both encouraging the common mode currents to take harmless paths (grounding) and blocking them from the harmful paths (baluns and/or burial).

The required isolation to reach the true reception potential of the site can be large. According to the measurements I quoted above, for my site the antenna noise floor is 18 dB below the conducted noise level at 10 MHz. 18 dB of isolation would thus make the levels equal, but we want to do better than that: we want the pickup of common mode EMI to be insignificant, at least 5 dB down from the antenna's floor. In my location the situation gets worse at higher frequencies as the natural noise level drops and therefore I become more sensitive: even 30 dB of isolation isn't enough to completely silence the common mode noise (but 36 dB is enough, except at my computer's CPU clock frequency of 25 MHz). 

Getting rid of the conducted noise can make a huge difference in the number and kinds of stations you can pick up: the 18 dB difference between the conducted and natural noise levels in the case above corresponds to the power difference between a 300 kW major world broadcaster and a modest 5 kW regional station.

The method I use is to ground the cable shield at two ground stakes and bury the cable in between. The scheme of alternating blocking methods with grounds will generally be the most effective. The ground stake near the house provides a place for the common mode noise current to go, far from the antenna where it cannot couple significantly. The ground stake at the base of my inverted-L antenna provides a place for the antenna current to flow, at a true ground potential relative to the antenna potential. The buried coax between these two points blocks noise currents. 

There has been some discussion of grounding problems on this and related echos. I believe it has been mentioned that electrical codes require that all grounds be tied together with heavy guage wire. 
I'm no expert on electrical codes, and codes differ in different countries. However, I believe that any such requirement must refer only to grounds used for safety in an electric power distribution system: I do not believe this applies to RF grounds.
Remember that proper grounding practice for electrical wiring has very little to do with RF grounding. The purpose of an electrical ground is to be at a safe potential (a few volts) relative to non-electrical grounded objects like plumbing. At an operating frequency of 50/60 Hz, it needs to have a low enough impedance (a fraction of an ohm) that in case of a short circuit a fuse or breaker will blow immediately.

At RF such low impedances are essentially impossible: even a few centimeters of thick wire is likely to exhibit an inductive impedance in the ohm range at 10 MHz (depends sensitively on the locations and connections of nearby conductors). Actual ground connections to real soil may exhibit resistive impedances in the tens of ohms. Despite this, a quiet RF ground needs to be within a fraction of a microvolt of the potential of the surrounding soil. This is difficult, and that's why a single ground is often not enough. 

A little experimentation with my radio showed that the chassis was directly connected to the third (grounding) prong of the wall plug. I am concerned that by connecting my receiver to an outside ground I am creating a ground loop that involves my house wiring. Can you comment on this? 

Yes, you have a "ground loop". It's harmless. In case of a nearby lightning strike it may actually save your receiver. My R8 isn't grounded like that, so I had to take steps to prevent the coax ground potential from getting wildly out of kilter with the line potential and arcing through the power supply. I'm using a surge supressor designed to protect video equipment: it has both AC outlets and feedthroughs with varistor or gas tube clamps to keep the various relative voltages in check. Of course the best lightning protection is to disconnect the receiver, but I'm a bit absent minded so I need a backup. 

This may seem like a trivial point but I recently discovered that the main ground from the electrical service panel in my house was attached to a water pipe which had been painted over. I stripped the paint from the pipe and re-attached the grounding clamp and I noticed a reduction in noise from my receiver. 
Not trivial. Not only did you improve reception, but your wiring is safer for having a good ground.

I suspect part of the reason I see so much noise from neighbors' appliances on my electric lines may be that my house's main ground wire is quite long. The electrical service comes in at the south corner of the house (which is where the breaker box is), while the water (to which the ground wire is clamped) enters at the east corner. All perfectly up to code and okay at 60 Hz, but lousy at RF: if it was shorter, presumably more of the noise current would want to go that way, and stay away from my receiver. 

I am also a little confused by what constitues an adequate ground. I have read that a conducting stake driven into the ground will divert lightning and provides for electrical safety but that RF grounding systems have to be a lot more complex with multiple radials with lengths related to the frequencies of interest. Is this true? 
Depends on what you're doing. If you're trying to get maximum signal transfer with a short loaded (resonant) vertical antenna with a radiation resistance of, say, 10 ohms, 20 ohms of ground resistance is going to be a big deal. If you're transmitting 50 kW, your ground resistance had better be *really* tiny or things are going to smoke, melt or arc.

On the other hand, a ground with a resistance of 20 ohms is going to be fairly effective at grounding a cable with a common mode characteristic impedance of a few hundred ohms (the characteristic impedance printed on the cable is for the differential mode; the common mode characteristic impedance depends somewhat on the distance of the cable from other conductors, but is usually in the range of hundreds of ohms). Of course, if it was lower a single ground might do the whole job (but watch out for mutual inductance coupling separate conductors as they approach your single ground).

In addition, a ground with a resistance of 20 ohms is fine for an unbalanced antenna fed with a high impedance transformer to supress resonance. Such a nonresonant antenna isn't particularly efficient, but high efficiency is not required for good reception at HF and below (not true for VHF and especially microwave frequencies). 

Much antenna lore comes from folks with transmitters who, armed with the "reciprocity" principle, assume that reception is the same problem. The reciprocity principle says that an antenna's transmission and reception properties are closely related: it's good physics, but it ignores the fact that the virtues required of a transmitting and receiving antenna are somewhat different. Inefficiency in a transmitting antenna has a direct, proportional effect on the received signal to noise ratio. On the other hand, moderate inefficiency in an HF receiving antenna usually has a negligible effect on the final result. A few picowatts of excess noise on a transmitting antenna has no effect on its function, but is a big deal if you're receiving (of course, one might not want to have transmitter power going out via unintended paths like utility lines: this is indeed the "reciprocal" of the conducted noise problem, and has similar solutions).

by John Doty
(as published on rec.radio.shortwave, February 1995) 


Grounding System

Perhaps one of the most overlooked aspects of setting up a listening post is a ground system. Any listener with a table top receiver will need a good ground system to operate their unit at its optimum level. This piece will deal with setting up a simple, yet effective, ground system that can be installed in a short period of time with a minimum number of tools. 

The first thing you will need three parts: 
The first is of course a good ground rod. 
You will also need a buss bar if you have more than one unit to ground. 
And finally some ground wire to tie the whole thing together. 

Let us look at the ground rod. 
Not all ground rods are created equally. When I went to put in my present system, I talked with several people from our local hydro electric company to see what they were using. They all agreed on one thing: you need a full sized 10 foot ( 3 metre) rod to be effective. 

This length will almost guarantee that the rod will stay in contact with moisture in all but the driest years. The ground can dry out to quite a depth during long hot dry periods, leaving shorter four to five foot rods useless. The rods must be kept moist to give a good ground, but more on this later. 
I also purchased a rod that had a built in connector so I did not have to purchase one to keep the ground wire attached. These work best and are easily found. 

Next was the selection of the wire I was to use. I ended up selecting 10 gauge copper wire that was covered in a heavy vinyl jacketing. What kind of wire to use is open to all sorts of opinions. I picked the 10 gauge as it was readily available and, although stiff, you could work with it fairly easily. 

A coated or insulated wire was chosen to make life easier for me. By using a coated wire it meant I could run the wire easier as I did not have to worry about it touching objects that are conductive in nature. Your ground wire must never touch any thing conductive as it will ruin the ground. A clear and unrestricted path from the radio(s) to the ground rod is a must and coated wire gives you more options of how and where to run the wire. 

The buss bar can be installed if you have more than one radio to ground, or if you plan to add to your listening post with other equipment that may require grounding. 

The bar is usually made from copper because of its conductivity. The bar need not be large. Mine is 3/4 of an inch (2 cm) wide and 10 inches (25cm) long. I can ground five to six pieces of equipment on it with no problems at all. 

Now that all of the parts have been purchased we can start on a simple but effective ground system that will last for years. 
You must first of all choose a site for the rod to be put in. One very important thing to consider is to keep the run of ground wire as short and as straight as possible. This will insure a better system. 
Keep the rod as close to the side of the house that your listening post is located. If your home is like mine, you may have underground hydro, telephone, and gas lines as well as water and sewer lines, so please call your local utilities to have them located before you start putting in a ground rod. You do not want to drive your ground rod into any of these lines. Putting a ten foot metal rod into a hydro or gas line can ruin your day! 

Once you have selected your spot you will have two options:
1) You can pound the rod into the ground leaving about 8-10 inches (20 cm) of it above ground;
2) Or you can for the deluxe option. 

I have gone for this latter route as it will over time help you keep the ground rod damp during dry times. This involves more work but if you live in climate like mine where the weather varies over a large spectrum or has long dry spells it is worth the extra effort. Also if you have heavy clay soils during rains the water will have an easier time to soak into the rock pit instead of running off. 
You can mark the ground where you wish to put the bar and measure one foot (30 cm) in all directions from this point. Mark the area off and then dig a hole in the area. 

This will result in a two foot (60 cm) square or diameter hole depending on how you dig it out. Either is acceptable. You should dig a hole that is about 2 feet (60 cm) deep, more if you wish. 
Once the hole is completed place the tip of your rod in the centre of the hole. You can now pound the rod into the ground leaving it the 8 inches (20 cm) above ground level (not the bottom of the hole). Have a friend help hold the rod as it will move around as you pound it in. Be careful not to hit your friend, as this may hurt the relationship as well... 

Once the rod is in place test it to insure it is in in tight. Try pulling and wiggling it to see if it moves. 
If it is in tight you have been successful. 
If it is close to a foundation or is in loose or sandy soil it will move around. This will not produce a good ground, so check it out. 
If you went the deluxe route you must now fill the hole with rock. Insure it is hard rock that will stay loose. Rock such as limestone is of no use as it will break up and form a hard packed area. You need loose rock fill that will not pack over time. 

You may also want to put is in a bag of rock salt before the rock. This salt once wet will start working on the rod to give better conductivity. This rock pit is put into place for one important reason: moisture. 
During dry periods I water the rock pit to insure moisture is getting down to the lower levels of the rod. The neighbours do kid me about it so if you embarrass easily do it at night. 

The next step is to install your buss bar is in your listening post. If you are going to use one it is easy to install. You can make one or buy one ready made. 

To build one just take your flat piece of copper and drill two holes is in it. One at either end that will act as anchor points to mount it on the wall near as possible to you equipment. You can now drill as many holes as you have pieces of equipment plus one more for the common lead into the bar. 

This will mean if you have four pieces of equipment to ground you will need: 
Two holes to mount the bar, one at either end.
Four holes for the equipment between the two anchor holes.
And one hole for the common lead, also between the anchor holes. 

Each of the holes, excepting the anchor holes at the top and bottom, will be drilled to put in a bolt and washer to attach the radios etc to. Use what ever you have at hand. 

Put in the bolts and washers into the pre-drilled holes. Using the two mounting holes screw the buss bar to the wall near to your equipment. Try to keep it centrally located to keep leads to the equipment as short as possible. 

Now that the bar is mounted run short straight pieces of heavy wire from each piece of equipment to the bass bar. 
You should use coated wire here to insure no wires touch each other or anything else. This is very important. Attach the other end of the wire to the lowest bolt and work your way up to the top. Insure the wire is under the washer so it presses the wire onto the buss bar insuring a tight and solid contact fit. This is a must. 

You can now attach a run of wire to the common at the top of the bar and run it to the ground rod outside. Once again insuring a solid contact . If your rod had no built in clap you can use metal strapping to get a solid tight fit to the rod.
When you connect any end of the wire to any piece of equipment or the buss bar or ground rod, insure you strip the wire and then using sanding or emery cloth clean the bare wire to insure there is a clean contact. 

You should use washers on binding posts to wire up the equipment. This will insure a solid contact. Loose contacts are of no use so make sure all contacts are good ones. 

Your ground system is now completed. Maintenance is little if any. You should from time to time check the connections to insure they are tight and in the case of the ground rod connection there is no corrosion. It may need to be cleaned once a year. 
When it is dry water your rock pit to insure a good ground year round. I flood mine until I can see the water sitting on top.

That is it, you now have a good ground system that will last years. 


Great ground with kitten litter

Bentonite is great for getting an excellent conductive ground. 
Bentonite? 
That's the stuff used in clumping kitty litters.

I had forgotten that the "clumping" litters are Bentonite. The brand we buy for our Siamese cat says that it's "a natural clay product...". 

That's the Bentonite! 

If you can locate a supply of the mineral called Bentonite, it makes an excellent ion-rich (and non-corrosive) backfill for ground rods and grounding systems. Professional antenna installations and electrical substations use Bentonite for lowering the resistance to earth. 
I have read that Bentonite is sold at animal feed stores; it is used as an additive to cattle & pig feed. Also, ceramic supply stores sometimes carry Bentonite, as it is a special clay used by potters. 
During a vacation one year, I got my initial supply of Bentonite directly from a refinery in Wyoming where they mine the stuff... they gave me some bags of Bentonite free because the bags were slightly ripped and they couldn't sell them. 

To use the Bentonite, you dig a hole eight inches or more in diameter, perhaps three feet deep (post-hole digger helps), and suspend the ground rod in the middle. Put in a few inches of the powdered or crushed Bentonite, water it thoroughly (it swells up tremendously with water), and then add another layer. Water that layer, and continue with water-soaked layers of Bentonite until the hole is filled up. 
The Bentonite absorbs the water, expands, and holds the ground rod very tightly in the center. Because of the expansion and Bentonite's conductive qualities, a lower resistance path to ground is achieved. It's sort of like using an eight-inch diameter ground rod at your site. The Bentonite never drys out, as it is "hydrophilic" and absorbs moisture from the soil to remain hydrated. 

If you do a web search on the term "bentonite" you'll come up with a lot more information about this mineral. Besides improving ground systems, it is used as a colloidal (suspension) product for everything from vinyl plastics to chocolate(!) to cosmetics. Also, Bentonite, in a highly refined form, is the key active ingredient in disposable baby diapers (I'm not kidding!). I know this trivia because Bentonite mining is one of the industries in the region of Wyoming where my wife's family resides. 
[It is also to be used as protective shock absorber for nuclear waste, dumped deep inside Sweden's rocky ground. -- hcdx editor]

Here in Bonney Lake, WA, our soil is very rocky, ancient glacial debris from Mt. Rainier. Even though we live on a small island and are surrounded by water, the soil is still very dry and rocky. Bentonite surrounding my ground rods has improved the directionality of my impedance-matched, terminated 175 ft. longwire. In my opinion there was an improvement in directivity to Papua New Guinea and Irian Jaya after improving the ground with Bentonite. 
I also use the same ground for K9AY electronics (the head unit), although I'm not positive this is really helping. It's worth a try, though, especially for poor soil. 

There was a IEEE paper written some years ago about Bentonite grounds. The careful measurements and comparisons they did showed clearly that resistance-to-ground was lowered when Bentonite was used. This method is clearly preferred over adding various salts to the soil... Bentonite won't corrode the ground rod nor harm the soil or surrounding vegetation. 

By Guy Atkins
hcdx list, August 10, 2000


Better ground with conductive cement

The resistance of an ordinary ground rod can permanently be cut in half by embedding it in a 3 to 6-inch radius of conductive cement such as Earthlink-101. 

The cement is poured in the 6-in. or 12-in. diameter hole, around the rod. 
It sets up as it absorbs moisture and stays moist. It's conductivity is 25 ohm-cm versus 5000-6000 ohm-cm for ordinary concrete. 
We tested this at Lucent Bell Laboratories in Chester, NJ.

By Clayton Hallmark
April 2000